“Just a warning, this isn’t financial advice,” goes the mantra of practically every online day trader. A great way to protect themselves from any negative criticism, it doubles as a cute catch phrase. If only the rest of us had a similar saying to deflect negative criticism when visiting our parent’s homes.
Recently, GMC, AMC, SNDL, NOK, BB, ETC have been getting love from Wall Street Robin Hoods. Stock-gurus who promise income from (essentially) informed gambling have found their come-up during the pandemic. Since the start of the pandemic, day traders claimed to make between thousands of dollars in hours, to millions in weeks. These huge claims have caught millions of eyes. People want to make fast money. They want to learn to invest. There is a huge market for people eager to learn who don’t understand the market but desperately want to.
Successful Day Trading Online
Many who day trader have promised wealth if you buy their program. If you buy into their discord, you’ll make thousands, they claim. People who pay for access to their website will get access to all sorts of good information, they say. If you send money to get notifications on tickers that could see a spike, huge money could come. Undoubtedly, this is great secondary source of income. They earn from their primary job, their investments, and the additional income from their programs, discords, websites or notifications.
Paid programs have made the guru liable to criticism. For example, those who have lost money on tickers have launched massive attacks on gurus and experts. Many complain that if one is earning enough from the stock market itself, they shouldn’t be charging for this information. Conversely, the day trader can be more reputable from charging. They’re putting themselves on the line at the risk of hurting their reputation if their programs or alerts aren’t worth it. They’re confident enough in their wealth of knowledge and information that they can charge.
Still, there are hordes of scam programs. Offered by supposed Wall Street geniuses, these scams don’t offer the user anything they don’t already know from free sources. These cheap programs or alerts might be totally worthless and just suck money from the viewer. There are dozens of successful day, swing, or long investors who offer knowledge to subscribers or viewers free of charge. If the viewer is charged, they must receive something they couldn’t have gotten for free.
Creating Trust in Viewers
You can earn the trust of an audience putting their cash into your advice with proof of your success. Followers, subscribers and viewers often care about the success of the guru’s results, not degrees or experience (unless it has paid off). People will not put their money into stocks recommended by those who haven’t made money of it. They will not trust the knowledge of someone who hasn’t made anything from their own experience.
People relying on the advisor in question want to know how they made their money. How much of a stock was bought? How much was sold? When was it bought? How did they know to buy and sell it? What software was used? How did they found out about this information? How they knew what good indicators were?
There should be a legitimate reason that someone who is making huge money would offer free or paid advice. Susceptible people make an easy target. People are less likely to trust a trader without legitimate reasons for offering these people help. Gullible people who want to invest properly but have no clue how to correctly do it are easily sold to. Gaining the trust of all means being honest rather than taking advantage of those ignorant.
Demographics and Fitting In
All beginner or advanced trader wants to see transparency in everything. The press releases of the companies their invested must contain all information. The earning reports should include all expenditures and earnings. News outlets that are promoting or demoting certain companies should be open about why they’re reporting them. They want to see transparency in their advisors – online and in the bank. Someone giving out great free or low-charge stock advice to people out of the goodness of their heart should show that goodness in other capacities. Is the guru otherwise charitable? Or, only when there is the possibility that people will buy their program or pump their tickers? Are they kind in other aspects? Do they offer help one-on-one? Do they respond to messages? How do they handle criticism? Are these actions and reactions pleasant and positive, or harsh and negative?
Advanced wealth gurus would use more advanced terminology to describe their due diligence. They might use more complicated indicators. They could explain complex concepts to viewers, who might already have a breadth of knowledge. Advanced viewers might have some success and could know if certain advice is wrong, moreso than beginners . Online day traders wanting to appeal to beginners would use simple language and terminology to describe what they’re talking about. They would explain how they got started and how they’ve noticed other people have gotten started as well. They would create informative and simple explainers on what indicators are and how they work.
Giving Day Trading Advice
Day traders who notify their followers on when to purchase stocks at specific times would be clear on their intentions. This includes being open about when they’re buying or selling, if they’re shorting or holding a stock and why. Trust between viewers and creators is of the utmost importance when money is involved. Financial advice given is reliant on the openness of an individual with a big platform.
A term thrown around and utilized by experts as a silent indicator is market psychology. It doesn’t have a numerical value. Still, people learning and even those experienced might not have a clear understanding of how it works. Knowing how others are thinking or feeling and how this affects the market can make a massive difference. So, when discussing market psychology, include sources, facts and details.
Does the viewer want someone to tell them what and when to invest? Or does the viewer want to be independent and know when to invest in a stock and why? Does the creator want the viewer to be reliant on their videos? Or learn from them and consult them for advice down the line? There are pros and cons to both sides. But, these also come into play when making videos, tweets or posts on stock advice or information.
By making the viewer reliant on a creator’s content, the creator has a steady stream of revenue. But, if they mess up, they could lose a chunk of their follower base. Therefore, videos that teach for independence sake have a much more varied and long-term viewership. This viewership might not be as consistent, but less likely to have a falling out.
Though your content isn’t technically financial advice, you’re still taking on the position and character of a financial advisor. You could hurt your reputation and be held liable. From a damaged reputation, you could hurt a great way of earning income. Advisor-advisee trust is definitive to an advisor’s success.
Image credit: Photo by Unsplash